[develop] Fix: UWP→WinAppSDK migration — UI, layout & platform#41
[develop] Fix: UWP→WinAppSDK migration — UI, layout & platform#41qiutongMS wants to merge 13 commits into
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Summary: I reviewed the latest PR diff and the full modified pages. Most of the migration edits are fine, but four of the new Windows App SDK API links are broken (404), and two of those changes also introduce WinAppSDK/UWP terminology mismatches in the surrounding prose. Must-fix issues:
Because these broken links were introduced by the PR, I can’t approve the current revision yet. |
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Review result: CHANGES_REQUESTED\n\nI found one must-fix issue in the latest PR state.\n\n- hub/apps/develop/platform/xaml/xaml-overview.md (Debug XAML section): the updated XamlParseException link was changed to /dotnet/api/Microsoft.UI.Xaml.markup.xamlparseexception?view=dotnet-uwp-10.0&preserve-view=true, but that URL returns 404 on Learn. The previous Windows.UI.Xaml.Markup.XamlParseException API page is the reachable Learn page, and Learn search for this topic still resolves to the Windows.UI type. Please restore a valid target before merge.\n\nI reviewed the latest PR diff and the full modified file content for this finding. |
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Summary: The PR's Windows App SDK link migration is mostly solid, but I found a few blocking issues in the current page state. Must-fix issues:
I spot-checked the updated Learn links and the new Windows App SDK links resolve, so the blockers are the content/code issues above. |
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Summary: Must-fix issues:
|
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Summary: The PR's link targets are generally reachable, but three pages now contain broken prose where inline API references were replaced with raw namespace text. Those regressions hurt readability and remove explanatory content, so the PR should not be approved yet. Must-fix issues:
|
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Summary: Must-fix:
|
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
SummaryI reviewed the latest PR diff and the full modified pages. Most link updates look good, but two modified pages still contain blocking correctness/syntax issues that should be fixed before merge. Must-Fix Issues
|
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Review summary: most of the API/link migrations look good, but I found two blocking reader-facing link issues before this can be approved. Must-fix issues:
|
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Summary: Must-fix issues:
|
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Review result: APPROVED I reviewed the latest PR diff and the full modified files only. The UWP→Windows App SDK API link updates, namespace migrations, and sample link replacements are technically consistent, the updated links I spot-checked are reachable, and I did not find any new issues that should block merge. |
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Review Result: APPROVEDSummaryReviewed the full latest diff for PR #41 across 37 modified pages. The UWP→WinUI 3 namespace/API-link migrations are technically sound, updated links resolve, markdown/code remain valid, and I found no must-fix issues in the latest diff. Must-Fix IssuesNone. Suggestions
Page Health Assessment
|
| private void BoldButton_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) | ||
| { | ||
| Windows.UI.Text.ITextSelection selectedText = editor.Document.Selection; | ||
| Microsoft.UI.Text.ITextSelection selectedText = editor.Document.Selection; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
这行的缩进没问题吗?包括这里上下的几行和挨着的几个文件
9efa89d to
a874e66
Compare
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
a874e66 to
577824c
Compare
Summary
Windows.UI.Xaml*/Windows::UI::Xaml*toMicrosoft.UI.Xaml*in the affected snippets.Validation
git diff --checkCompleteness
Skipped Findings
hub/apps/develop/ui/windowing-overview.md— the report proposed replacing a note that intentionally compares the UWPWindows.UI.Xaml.Windowtype with WinUI behavior. Changing that reference would make the note technically incorrect, so the page was intentionally left unchanged.