refactor: use renderable guard for menu item extras

[QDyanbing]

说明

• 使用 isReactRenderable 统一判断菜单项 extra 是否需要渲染
• 移除本地重复的 0 特殊判断，统一 ReactNode 展示语义
• 将 @rc-component/util 的最低版本提升到首次提供该 helper 的 ^1.13.0

验证

• npm run tsc
• npm run lint
• npm test -- tests/Options.spec.tsx --runInBand

Summary by CodeRabbit

• 问题修复
  • 优化菜单额外内容（extra）的渲染判断。
  • 对不可渲染的值（如布尔值、空字符串等）不再错误生成内容，提升菜单显示的准确性与稳定性。

[vercel]

@QDyanbing is attempting to deploy a commit to the afc163's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: bc1e5925-5ca0-4f82-93a0-7ad2a2f3adb9

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d8d0629 and 05dbf61.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• package.json
• src/utils/nodeUtil.tsx

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 4 included reviews per hour; 3 remain after this review.

---

Walkthrough

本次变更升级 @rc-component/util，并将菜单项 extra 的判断改为基于 React 可渲染性。

Changes

菜单项 extra 渲染

Layer / File(s)	Summary
更新 extra 渲染判断 package.json, src/utils/nodeUtil.tsx	将 @rc-component/util 从 ^1.11.1 升级到 ^1.13.0。convertItemsToNodes 使用 isReactRenderable(extra) 决定是否渲染 extra。

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 05dbf

This localized change standardizes how menu item extras are rendered and updates the minimum utility dependency version; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks and review.

Suggested reviewers: zombiej

Poem

小兔捧起新工具，
菜单枝头检 extra。
可渲染时轻轻现，
非节点值静静下。
依赖版本也更新，
代码清爽迎春芽。

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 1 functions across 1 files. (1 skipped: 1 …	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	标题准确概括了主要变更：菜单项 extra 内容改用可渲染值检查逻辑。标题简洁、明确，并与代码和 PR 目标一致。
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 1 functions across 1 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

• Fix all pre-merge checks with AI

✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1

🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.72%. Comparing base (d8d0629) to head (05dbf61).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #894   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.72%   99.72%           
=======================================
  Files          26       26           
  Lines         735      735           
  Branches      205      204    -1     
=======================================
  Hits          733      733           
  Misses          2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.