Skip to content

fix: Phase 0 consistency, incremental QA, and user handoff#44

Open
mythkiven wants to merge 1 commit into
revfactory:mainfrom
mythkiven:fix/phase-consistency-handoff
Open

fix: Phase 0 consistency, incremental QA, and user handoff#44
mythkiven wants to merge 1 commit into
revfactory:mainfrom
mythkiven:fix/phase-consistency-handoff

Conversation

@mythkiven

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Fixes three issues: Phase number mismatch (Phase 1 vs Phase 0 context check), missing incremental QA guidance in orchestrator templates, and missing post-build user handoff step.

Motivation

Same fixes as open PR #6 — internal doc inconsistency and onboarding gap.

Scope of change

  • skills/harness/SKILL.md (Phase 5-5, 6-7, checklist)
  • orchestrator-template.md incremental QA section
  • CHANGELOG.md

SemVer impact

patch — no breaking behavior.


Re-opened contribution — branch restored after accidental close.

Made with Cursor

Align SKILL.md Phase 5-5/checklist with orchestrator Template A Phase 0,
add incremental QA rules to orchestrator-template, and Phase 6-7 user
handoff guidance after harness build completes.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@chipoto69

Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-steward autopilot tick 2026-06-17 17:50 CEST: cross-linked from conflicted predecessor #6. Current GitHub state shows this PR is CLEAN and covers the same three fixes that #6 attempted: Phase 0 consistency, incremental QA guidance, and user handoff. No status checks are configured/reported on the PR.

Merge-lane recommendation: treat #44 as the successor path for this change set; after maintainer review/merge, close #6 as superseded rather than rebasing the old fork branch. I did not merge or approve in this tick because local Kanban/git verification is blocked by ENOSPC/disk I/O symptoms on Rudy’s machine, so full local validation could not be rerun.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants