Skip to content

Start-ThreadJob instead of Start-Job #34

Closed
#43
Closed
Start-ThreadJob instead of Start-Job#34
#43

Description

@rulasg
rulasg
opened on Apr 12, 2024

Start-ThreadJob has better performance speed and less resources as it multi task on thread and not on process/job

Activity

  1. rulasg
    self-assigned this
    on Apr 12, 2024
  2. rulasg
    removed their assignment
    on May 7, 2024
  3. rulasg
    linked a pull request that will close this issueUse Start-ThreadJob for asynchronous operations #43on Jun 9, 2026

  4. rulasg commented on Jun 9, 2026

    @rulasg
    rulasg
    on Jun 9, 2026
    OwnerAuthor

    Done for v1.2.5

  5. rulasg
    closed this as completedon Jun 9, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions