Rollup of 15 pull requests

[JonathanBrouwer]

Successful merges:

• resolve: fix effective visibilities for items in ambiguous glob sets #159039 (resolve: fix effective visibilities for items in ambiguous glob sets)
• Deny todo!() in tidy #157706 (Deny todo!() in tidy)
• Fix trait method resolution on an adjusted never type #156047 (Fix trait method resolution on an adjusted never type)
• Support #[track_caller] on EII declarations #158535 (Support #[track_caller] on EII declarations)
• First steps of late-bound turbofishing (place FnDef behind a dummy binder) #158632 (First steps of late-bound turbofishing (place FnDef behind a dummy binder))
• Fix unused variable warnings for diverging expressions #158846 (Fix unused variable warnings for diverging expressions)
• Small refactorings in need_type_info module #159002 (Small refactorings in need_type_info module)
• Bump rustc-demangle to 0.1.28 #159202 (Bump rustc-demangle to 0.1.28)
• Avoid using probe self_ty for delegation arguments #159216 (Avoid using probe self_ty for delegation arguments)
• Consider structurally impossible Sized predicates in MIR #156609 (Consider structurally impossible Sized predicates in MIR)
• Expose more info about ADTs and functions in rustc_public #157993 (Expose more info about ADTs and functions in rustc_public)
• Clarify as_uninit_mut may point to uninitialized memory #158804 (Clarify as_uninit_mut may point to uninitialized memory)
• Add #[rustc_test_entrypoint_marker] #158854 (Add #[rustc_test_entrypoint_marker])
• Some minor ast validation and visiting cleanups #158998 (Some minor ast validation and visiting cleanups)
• doc: clarify attr parser APIs #159123 (doc: clarify attr parser APIs)

r? @ghost

Create a similar rollup

[rust-bors]

📌 Commit b1212ab has been approved by JonathanBrouwer

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[rust-bors]

💔 Test for 776dc9e failed: CI. Failed job:

• auto - x86_64-gnu-llvm-22-3 (web logs, enhanced plaintext logs)

[rust-log-analyzer]

The job x86_64-gnu-llvm-22-3 failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain enhanced) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

    |
801 | pub fn unused_pub_fn() {}
    |        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    |
    = note: in libraries, `pub` items can be used by dependent crates; in binaries, they cannot, so this `pub` item is unused
note: the lint level is defined here
   --> compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/builtin.rs:798:9
    |
798 | #![deny(dead_code_pub_in_binary)]
    |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
---
---- compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/builtin.rs - builtin::FORBIDDEN_LINT_GROUPS (line 168) stdout ----
warning: warn(bad_style) incompatible with previous forbid
   --> compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/builtin.rs:170:9
    |
169 | #![forbid(warnings)]
    |           -------- `forbid` level set here
170 | #![warn(bad_style)]
    |         ^^^^^^^^^ overruled by previous forbid
    |
    = warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
    = note: for more information, see issue #81670 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81670>
    = note: `#[warn(forbidden_lint_groups)]` (part of `#[warn(future_incompatible)]`) on by default
---
    |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ overruled by previous forbid
    |
   ::: compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/builtin.rs:169:11
    |
169 | #![forbid(warnings)]
    |           -------- `forbid` level set here
    |
    = warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
    = note: for more information, see issue #81670 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81670>

error: the feature `rustdoc_internals` is internal to the compiler or standard library
---
    = note: using it is strongly discouraged
note: the lint level is defined here
   --> compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/builtin.rs:169:11
    |
169 | #![forbid(warnings)]
    |           ^^^^^^^^
    = note: `#[forbid(internal_features)]` implied by `#[forbid(warnings)]`

error: aborting due to 1 previous error; 2 warnings emitted

Couldn't compile the test.
\ (no newline at end of output)
---
     |     - type must be known at this point
     |
help: consider giving `x` an explicit type
     |
5548 |     let x: /* Type */ = panic!();
     |          ++++++++++++

error: aborting due to 1 previous error; 1 warning emitted

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0282`.
---

test result: FAILED. 115 passed; 4 failed; 29 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 1.55s

all doctests ran in 2.00s; merged doctests compilation took 0.44s
error: doctest failed, to rerun pass `-p rustc_lint_defs --doc`
Bootstrap failed while executing `--stage 1 test --skip src/tools/tidy --skip src/tools/linkchecker`
Currently active steps:
test::CrateLibrustc { build_compiler: Compiler { stage: 0, host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, forced_compiler: false }, target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, crates: ["rustc-main", "rustc_abi", "rustc_arena", "rustc_ast", "rustc_ast_ir", "rustc_ast_lowering", "rustc_ast_passes", "rustc_ast_pretty", "rustc_attr_parsing", "rustc_baked_icu_data", "rustc_borrowck", "rustc_builtin_macros", "rustc_codegen_llvm", "rustc_codegen_ssa", "rustc_const_eval", "rustc_data_structures", "rustc_driver", "rustc_driver_impl", "rustc_error_codes", "rustc_error_messages", "rustc_errors", "rustc_expand", "rustc_feature", "rustc_fs_util", "rustc_graphviz", "rustc_hashes", "rustc_hir", "rustc_hir_analysis", "rustc_hir_id", "rustc_hir_pretty", "rustc_hir_typeck", "rustc_incremental", "rustc_index", "rustc_index_macros", "rustc_infer", "rustc_interface", "rustc_lexer", "rustc_lint", "rustc_lint_defs", "rustc_llvm", "rustc_log", "rustc_macros", "rustc_metadata", "rustc_middle", "rustc_mir_build", "rustc_mir_dataflow", "rustc_mir_transform", "rustc_monomorphize", "rustc_next_trait_solver", "rustc_parse", "rustc_parse_format", "rustc_passes", "rustc_pattern_analysis", "rustc_privacy", "rustc_proc_macro", "rustc_public", "rustc_public_bridge", "rustc_query_impl", "rustc_resolve", "rustc_sanitizers", "rustc_serialize", "rustc_session", "rustc_span", "rustc_symbol_mangling", "rustc_target", "rustc_thread_pool", "rustc_trait_selection", "rustc_traits", "rustc_transmute", "rustc_ty_utils", "rustc_type_ir", "rustc_type_ir_macros", "rustc_windows_rc"] } at src/bootstrap/src/core/build_steps/test.rs:3195
test::Crate { build_compiler: Compiler { stage: 0, host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, forced_compiler: false }, target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, mode: Rustc, crates: ["rustc-main", "rustc_abi", "rustc_arena", "rustc_ast", "rustc_ast_ir", "rustc_ast_lowering", "rustc_ast_passes", "rustc_ast_pretty", "rustc_attr_parsing", "rustc_baked_icu_data", "rustc_borrowck", "rustc_builtin_macros", "rustc_codegen_llvm", "rustc_codegen_ssa", "rustc_const_eval", "rustc_data_structures", "rustc_driver", "rustc_driver_impl", "rustc_error_codes", "rustc_error_messages", "rustc_errors", "rustc_expand", "rustc_feature", "rustc_fs_util", "rustc_graphviz", "rustc_hashes", "rustc_hir", "rustc_hir_analysis", "rustc_hir_id", "rustc_hir_pretty", "rustc_hir_typeck", "rustc_incremental", "rustc_index", "rustc_index_macros", "rustc_infer", "rustc_interface", "rustc_lexer", "rustc_lint", "rustc_lint_defs", "rustc_llvm", "rustc_log", "rustc_macros", "rustc_metadata", "rustc_middle", "rustc_mir_build", "rustc_mir_dataflow", "rustc_mir_transform", "rustc_monomorphize", "rustc_next_trait_solver", "rustc_parse", "rustc_parse_format", "rustc_passes", "rustc_pattern_analysis", "rustc_privacy", "rustc_proc_macro", "rustc_public", "rustc_public_bridge", "rustc_query_impl", "rustc_resolve", "rustc_sanitizers", "rustc_serialize", "rustc_session", "rustc_span", "rustc_symbol_mangling", "rustc_target", "rustc_thread_pool", "rustc_trait_selection", "rustc_traits", "rustc_transmute", "rustc_ty_utils", "rustc_type_ir", "rustc_type_ir_macros", "rustc_windows_rc"] } at src/bootstrap/src/core/build_steps/test.rs:3202
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:43:34

[rust-bors]

PR #156047, which is a member of this rollup, was unapproved.

[JonathanBrouwer]

That PR is not the only problem here tho..., looking further