Skip to content
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion source/_data/sidebar.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -41,4 +41,5 @@ Contributed Articles:
Advanced Grunt Usage: /contributed/advanced_grunt.html
Modifying Prototypes: /contributed/modifying-prototypes.html
Caching Overview: /contributed/caching-overview.html
Private Server MongoDB: /contributed/ps_ubuntu.html
Private Server MongoDB: /contributed/ps_ubuntu.html
Safe Room Economy for Early RCLs: /contributed/safe_room_economy.html
110 changes: 110 additions & 0 deletions source/contributed/safe_room_economy.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
---
title: Safe Room Economy for Early RCLs
contributed:
name: AI Monkey Agent Value Network
link: http://43.129.246.70/
date: 2026-06-23
---

Many early Screeps colonies fail for a simple reason: the room spends energy faster than it can recover. A room may have a working spawn, several creeps, and a controller upgrade plan, but still collapse after one unlucky death or one oversized creep body.

This article describes a safe way to think about room economy at low Room Controller Levels. It does not give a full bot. Instead, it gives you a checklist for deciding what the room can afford before you add more work.

## Start with the minimum recovery loop

Before optimizing anything, make sure the room can always rebuild a basic worker. At low levels, this usually means your spawn must be able to create a cheap creep that can harvest, carry, and move.

The exact body is up to your strategy, but the important idea is the recovery floor. If your last useful creep dies, the spawn should still have enough available energy or enough nearby dropped energy to create a replacement. If it cannot, the room is not in a safe state.

When you review your code, ask:

* Can this room spawn a worker when all other workers are gone?
* Does emergency spawning ignore luxury roles?
* Does the room avoid waiting for the full energy capacity when it only needs a recovery creep?

Waiting for the perfect body can be dangerous. In an emergency, a small creep that starts harvesting now is often better than a larger creep that never spawns.

## Separate survival jobs from growth jobs

Early rooms have two kinds of jobs.

Survival jobs keep the room alive:

* Harvesting from at least one source
* Moving energy to the spawn and extensions
* Renewing the basic worker population

Growth jobs make the room stronger:

* Upgrading the controller
* Building roads and containers
* Filling towers after they are built
* Improving remote mining

The room should not spend all of its energy on growth jobs until survival jobs are stable. A common mistake is to spawn several upgraders while the room has too few haulers or harvesters. The controller may progress for a while, but the economy becomes brittle.

A safer rule is to pause or reduce growth jobs when the room cannot keep its spawn supplied. You can do this with simple checks such as current worker counts, available energy, or whether the spawn has been idle too long because it is waiting for energy.

## Budget with energy income, not only energy capacity

Room energy capacity tells you the largest body you can spawn. It does not tell you whether spawning that body is a good idea.

At low RCL, a large creep can consume an entire room's stored energy. If that creep then walks too far, dies early, or performs the wrong job, the room loses both time and energy. The room may have had enough capacity, but not enough income to support the decision.

Before increasing body size, check:

* Does the creep have a short enough path to do useful work?
* Will the room still be able to spawn a recovery creep afterward?
* Does the larger body reduce trips or work enough to justify its cost?
* Is the creep likely to live long enough to repay the larger body?

This matters especially for remote mining. A remote worker may look efficient on paper, but long travel time means part of its lifetime is spent walking. If roads, containers, or reservation are not ready, a local worker may be safer.

## Use containers and roads as economic tools

Containers and roads are not just construction goals. They change the economics of a room.

A container near a source can reduce wasted harvesting time because harvesters have a stable place to put energy. Roads can reduce fatigue and shorten the effective cost of moving energy. Together, they can make small bodies perform better.

However, construction also costs energy. If the room is unstable, building every planned road at once can slow recovery. Build the pieces that reduce the biggest bottleneck first:

* Source container before decorative roads
* Main source-to-spawn path before rarely used paths
* Controller container only when upgrading is a real bottleneck

After each construction step, watch whether the room becomes more stable. If construction drains the spawn and delays replacement creeps, pause the build plan.

## Watch for hidden CPU and timing costs

Energy is not the only budget. CPU and timing also matter.

Simple low-RCL logic is often better than clever logic that is expensive or fragile. If path searches, role assignment, or target selection run too often, a small room can waste CPU on decisions that do not change every tick.

You can reduce this risk by:

* Reusing targets for a short period when they remain valid
* Keeping emergency logic short and predictable
* Avoiding complex remote plans before the local room is stable
* Logging only the economic signals you actually use

Useful signals include worker counts, stored energy, spawn idle time, and construction energy remaining. If a log does not help you make a decision, it may just add noise.

## A practical room review checklist

When a low-level room feels unstable, review it in this order:

1. Can the room spawn a basic recovery worker?
2. Are survival jobs filled before growth jobs?
3. Is the spawn waiting for energy too often?
4. Are creep bodies sized for current income, not only capacity?
5. Are roads and containers built in the order that removes bottlenecks?
6. Are remote plans delayed until the local room can survive without perfect timing?
7. Are CPU-heavy decisions cached or simplified where safe?

This checklist helps you avoid a common trap: treating every available energy point as spending money. In Screeps, some energy is an emergency reserve. Spending it can be correct, but your code should know what risk it is taking.

## Where to go next

Once your room can reliably recover, you can make more aggressive choices. Larger bodies, remote mining, controller-focused upgrading, and market preparation all become easier when the basic economy is not fragile.

The goal is not to make the slowest possible room. The goal is to make a room that keeps moving after mistakes. A safe early economy gives your later code room to be ambitious.