Skip to content

test: document ctags false positive on JS prototype calls #2196

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
squid-protocol merged 3 commits into from
Aug 23, 2026
Merged

test: document ctags false positive on JS prototype calls #2196

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
e213033
fix: skip class extraction for languages with class_start=None
squid-protocol Aug 23, 2026
7b755e1
test: document ctags false positive on JS prototype calls
squid-protocol Aug 23, 2026
1235828
Merge main, resolve ledger conflict
squid-protocol Aug 23, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions tests/tools/ctags_reader.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -344,6 +344,8 @@ def has_ctags() -> bool:
# placeholder emitted at all -- see docs/why_gitgalaxy_beats_ast_here.md's Claim 3 for the full
# writeup and a minimal repro; this is ctags' own scanner hitting an equivalent, independently-
# triggered version of the same cascade tree-sitter-javascript already hits there.
# (3) ctags falsely tags function CALLS on prototype methods (e.g. `Material.prototype.copy.call(...)`)
# as method declarations, extracting a method named `copy`. GitGalaxy and tree-sitter correctly ignore these.
# kotlin: ctags has no separate free-function kind -- top-level functions tag "m" too
# (verified via probe file: a file-scope `fun` with no enclosing class still tags "m",
# just without a `class:` field), so "m" alone already covers both cases.
Expand Down
Loading