Skip to content

fix: ownerRef for driver pod, ensuring correct GC cascade - #758

Open
Maleware wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/701-restore-driver-ownerreference
Open

fix: ownerRef for driver pod, ensuring correct GC cascade#758
Maleware wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/701-restore-driver-ownerreference

Conversation

@Maleware

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Solves: #701

Definition of Done Checklist

Author

  • Changes are OpenShift compatible
  • CRD changes approved
  • CRD documentation for all fields, following the style guide.
  • Helm chart can be installed and deployed operator works
  • Integration tests passed (for non trivial changes)
  • Changes need to be "offline" compatible
  • Links to generated (nightly) docs added
  • Release note snippet added

Reviewer

  • Code contains useful comments
  • Code contains useful logging statements
  • (Integration-)Test cases added
  • Documentation added or updated. Follows the style guide.
  • Changelog updated
  • Cargo.toml only contains references to git tags (not specific commits or branches)

Acceptance

  • Feature Tracker has been updated
  • Proper release label has been added
  • Links to generated (nightly) docs added
  • Release note snippet added
  • Add type/deprecation label & add to the deprecation schedule
  • Add type/experimental label & add to the experimental features tracker

@Maleware Maleware changed the title Fix ownerRef for driver pod, ensuring correct GC cascade fix: ownerRef for driver pod, ensuring correct GC cascade Aug 26, 2026
@Maleware
Maleware requested a review from razvan August 26, 2026 16:07
@Maleware Maleware self-assigned this Aug 26, 2026
@Maleware Maleware moved this to Development: Waiting for Review in Stackable Engineering Aug 26, 2026
@Maleware

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

There is still an unsolved downside to it:

Pods which haven't had a CR and are still running while upgrading the operator won't be cleaned up and run into an error loop. I'm still unsure whether this can be solved in an reasonable amount of time and complexity. Thus I'd rather open another issue for this and discuss it separately.

@Maleware
Maleware marked this pull request as ready for review August 26, 2026 16:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Development: Waiting for Review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant