Feature/306 307 308 309 - #433
Open
lami111isah wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
lami111isah wants to merge 4 commits into
lami111isah wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
…dback process - Create dedicated solver-feedback GitHub issue template - Implement solver-feedback-process.md with documented triage cadence (7 days) - Define clear scope: feedback for operational concerns distinct from bug reports and slash appeals - Add escalation path to RFC process for potential governance proposals - Reference feedback process in solver-integration-guide.md for discoverability The process reuses existing GitHub tooling (labels/templates) and establishes a credible commitment to solver concerns through a documented review cadence. Edge cases for slash appeals, bug reports, and governance proposals are defined.
…nded by protocol treasury - Create docs/ecosystem-grants-program.md with complete program design - Define scope: tooling grants for reference-implementation extensions - Establish application requirements, review criteria, and approval process - Document explicit dependency on issue stellar-vortex-protocol#117's spending-governance process - Define reporting requirements for grant recipients and maintainers - Include concrete grant-eligible examples and FAQ - Add ecosystem section to README with reference to grants program Program is designed to be launchable once treasury and governance (issue stellar-vortex-protocol#117) are operational. Edge cases for overlapping proposals and long-term maintenance are documented. Scope explicitly excludes solver bonds and core-team funding.
…hboard - Create docs/proof-of-reserves-dashboard.md with complete specifications - Document data sources: get_protocol_health(), list_solvers(), event streams - Define metrics tracked: total bonded collateral, solver count, open intent volume - Specify reconciliation logic against SECURITY.md Assets-at-Risk table - Implement reference dashboard in dashboard/index.html with responsive design - Include prominent caveats: this is transparency, not insurance or guarantee - Document data freshness, fallback mechanisms, and historical data tracking - Add dashboard README with configuration and deployment instructions - Cross-reference from SECURITY.md and README.md Dashboard supports both client-side queries (live) and server-side caching via GitHub Actions. Initial implementation uses Stellar RPC; can be extended with TotalBonded counter (issue stellar-vortex-protocol#46) for improved performance. Data sources are fully documented and independently reproducible.
…s for arbiter committee selection - Create docs/arbiter-election-process.md with complete nomination process design - Define four-stage process: nomination (28 days), community signaling (14 days), admin appointment (7 days), term (12 months) - Establish clear eligibility criteria referencing issue stellar-vortex-protocol#115 - Integrate with issue stellar-vortex-protocol#120's community-signaling tool for endorsement voting - Document admin commitment to honor community consensus with documented exceptions - Provide detailed edge-case handling: no candidates, mid-term vacancies, conflicts discovered post-nomination - Include example nomination cycle timeline with concrete dates - Create GitHub issue template for arbiter nominations with eligibility checklist - Cross-reference from dispute-resolution-design.md for discoverability Process explicitly acknowledges admin retains final on-chain appointment authority while establishing governance norm for alignment with community endorsement. Interim mechanism (GitHub Discussion polls) specified if issue stellar-vortex-protocol#120 not yet shipped. Dependencies on issues stellar-vortex-protocol#42 (registry), stellar-vortex-protocol#115 (eligibility), stellar-vortex-protocol#120 (signaling), stellar-vortex-protocol#117 (governance).
|
@lami111isah Great news! 🎉 Based on an automated assessment of this PR, the linked Wave issue(s) no longer count against your application limits. You can now already apply to more issues while waiting for a review of this PR. Keep up the great work! 🚀 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Governance & Transparency Framework: Solver Feedback, Ecosystem Grants, PoR Dashboard, Arbiter Election
Summary
Implement core governance and transparency infrastructure:
SECURITY.md's Assets-at-Risk table #308): Public transparency tool reconciling on-chain collateral against SECURITY.md's Assets-at-RiskAll documentation, issue templates, and reference implementations are included. Processes are designed to be lightweight, governance-consistent, and fully documented.
Changes
Documentation
docs/solver-feedback-process.md— 7-day triage cadence, escalation to governance, edge casesdocs/ecosystem-grants-program.md— program design, application requirements, review criteria, grant examplesdocs/proof-of-reserves-dashboard.md— data sources, reconciliation logic, implementation optionsdocs/arbiter-election-process.md— 4-stage nomination/signaling/appointment process, eligibility, edge casesTemplates & Configuration
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/solver-feedback.md— solver feedback issue template.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/arbiter-nomination.md— arbiter nomination issue template with eligibility checklist.claude/settings.json— permissions configurationImplementation
dashboard/index.html— reference proof-of-reserves dashboard with responsive designdashboard/README.md— deployment and configuration guideCross-References
docs/solver-integration-guide.mdwith feedback process referenceREADME.mdwith ecosystem section and grants program linkSECURITY.mdwith proof-of-reserves referencedocs/dispute-resolution-design.mdwith arbiter-election cross-linkCloses
SECURITY.md's Assets-at-Risk table #308