ci: include Xtensa in binary size comparisons - #5654
Open
jakebailey wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
jakebailey
commented
Sep 4, 2026
jakebailey
marked this pull request as draft
September 4, 2026 21:38
jakebailey
force-pushed
the
ci-xtensa-sizediff
branch
from
September 4, 2026 21:50
c524d7c to
ac8bd9a
Compare
jakebailey
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 5, 2026 03:20
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pulls out the llvm build stuff from assert-linux into a composite local workflow then reuses that for sizediff, such that a build of llvm with xtensa support is available.