Skip to content

Initial support for PolyNull - #1813

Draft
msridhar wants to merge 14 commits into
masterfrom
polynull-explicit
Draft

msridhar wants to merge 14 commits into
masterfrom
polynull-explicit

Conversation

@msridhar

@msridhar msridhar commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Fixes #1616

@msridhar

msridhar commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

This change is part of the following stack:

Change managed by git-spice.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 91.90601% with 31 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 87.80%. Comparing base (f866bc9) to head (a63ed66).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ava/com/uber/nullaway/generics/GenericsChecks.java 90.96% 6 Missing and 8 partials ⚠️
.../com/uber/nullaway/generics/PolyNullInference.java 90.42% 3 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
...m/uber/nullaway/handlers/LibraryModelsHandler.java 92.30% 1 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...r/nullaway/librarymodel/NestedTypePathUpdater.java 85.00% 1 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...src/main/java/com/uber/nullaway/LibraryModels.java 60.00% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1813      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     87.69%   87.80%   +0.10%     
- Complexity     3450     3522      +72     
============================================
  Files           110      111       +1     
  Lines         11475    11797     +322     
  Branches       2355     2406      +51     
============================================
+ Hits          10063    10358     +295     
- Misses          652      664      +12     
- Partials        760      775      +15     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add some kind of @PolyNull-like support within library models?

1 participant