Fix possible artifact: gpg/secring.gpg - #17
Conversation
Type: Secret Asymmetric Private Key Severity: HIGH Match: ********************
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 2 included reviews per hour; 1 remains after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe ASCII-armored private key payload was removed from Changes
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The change is limited to deleting content from one file, and no actionable merge-blocking risk remains beyond normal checks and review. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Small change to
gpg/secring.gpg— a scan flagged the code below and it looked genuine. It is around line 3.The repository contains
gpg/secring.gpg, which holds a GPG private (secret) key. Exposing a private key allows attackers to decrypt any data encrypted for the key, sign malicious commits or packages, and impersonate the key owner, leading to full compromise of the supply chain. Because the secret key is a high‑value credential, this is classified as a HIGH‑severity issue and requires immediate removal and key rotation.The repository contains a private PGP key that poses a high security risk. Removing the key prevents accidental exposure.
For reference: rule
private-key. Rated high.I may well be missing context here — if the current code is deliberate, feel free to close this.
Found with automated scanning (RedGem) and reviewed before opening. If it is not useful, closing it is completely fine.
Summary by CodeRabbit