Skip to content

docs: MRC93 Compute Subnet Protocol & Provider Standards - #86

Open
robertjchristian wants to merge 1 commit into
MorpheusAIs:mainfrom
DRM3Labs:main
Open

robertjchristian wants to merge 1 commit into
MorpheusAIs:mainfrom
DRM3Labs:main

Conversation

@robertjchristian

@robertjchristian robertjchristian commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

MRC 93: Compute Subnet Protocol & Provider Standards

MRC 93 here

Proposes six areas of standardization for the Morpheus compute subnet, based on findings from building Pistachio, an independent Rust consumer node.

  1. Contract Deployment Transparency - Published mapping between on-chain bytecode and source tags
  2. MOR RPC Protocol Specification - Formal spec for the TCP runtime protocol (framing, lifecycle, ECIES, error codes, sequence diagrams for all failure modes)
  3. Reference Test Suite - Offline validation for independent implementations
  4. Provider Response Standard - Structured error envelope, no raw backend passthrough
  5. Provider Quality and Accountability - On-chain support contact, software version, certification
  6. Governance and Enforcement - Attestation authority, funding pool transparency, protocol change notification

New weights requested: 0 (specification only). A follow-up MRC will scope companion artifacts.

Author: Robert Christian, DRM3 Labs
Category: Compute (MRI #3)
Dependencies: MRC05, MRC25, MRC57

@FellowTraveler

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Great work!

EnergyHound added a commit to EnergyHound/MRC that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2026
Defines Option A (Base-only) and Option B (per-claim Base or Arbitrum),
the rationale for dual support vs Base-only, and a mandatory SOW bid
process for the smart-contract developer before scope freezes.

Numbered 94 because open PRs MorpheusAIs#85/MorpheusAIs#86 reserve MRC91–93 for unrelated
compute/runtime work. No existing MRC covers capital claim mint chain
destination (MRC43/56/64 are related but different).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants