Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
50 changes: 50 additions & 0 deletions site/COPY-REVIEW.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,5 +1,55 @@
# Website copy review: September 16, 2026

## Review candidate: Root Sequence router role — September 25, 2026

**Status: awaiting Rae Lovejoy's editorial approval. Not approved for release.**

This candidate updates the public explanation after the merged
adaptive-continuity / research-method work changed Root Sequence's current
self-description.

The one-page structure, headline **"Research for a more coherent world,"**
reading controls, selected-project section, participation routes, visual
design, embedded assets, and publication architecture remain unchanged.

### Copy changes

- The introduction now describes Root Sequence as an **open transdisciplinary
research and design project for questions that cross fields**.
- The About section explains the current workflow in plain language:
trace the whole problem, identify the different kinds of question inside it,
route mechanisms to the fields and methods that study them, then reconnect
the findings without pretending the mechanisms are identical.
- The repair example no longer presents "coherence" as the catch-all answer.
It shows the device, software, access, ownership, cost, and decision-right
questions as different parts of one problem and routes readers to the
Method & Concept Router.
- The six Selected Research entries now foreground:
1. Root Sequence Research Method;
2. *Coherence Is a Systems Property*;
3. Adaptive continuity and dynamic coherence;
4. Epistemic discoverability and knowledge routing;
5. Legible Systems;
6. Reading Trails.
- The social/metadata description now reflects the transdisciplinary
research-and-design role.

### What this candidate does not claim

The site does not say Root Sequence invented the native theories it routes to.
It does not present Dynamic Coherence as a universal analysis method or score.
It does not claim the editorial router pilots validated the method.

The research repository remains the canonical source for the details and
evidence boundaries.

### Approval boundary

`approval.json` is intentionally unchanged from the 2026-09-18 approved
edition. The release builder must continue to reject this candidate until a
new exact-source approval is recorded.


## Approval update: name explanation — September 18, 2026

The current candidate adds a short **Why “Root Sequence”?** passage to the
Expand Down
14 changes: 9 additions & 5 deletions site/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,11 +2,15 @@

This directory is the canonical source for `rootsequence.systems`.

The current [`index.html`](index.html) is the single-page public seed approved
by Rae Lovejoy on 2026-09-18. It includes a short explanation of the name Root
Sequence, a link to the canonical concept page, and the six-item Selected
Research section. It is tied to the exact digest recorded in
[`approval.json`](approval.json).
The current [`index.html`](index.html) on this branch is a **review candidate**
updated on 2026-09-25 to reflect Root Sequence's router-and-synthesis role,
canonical research method, adaptive-continuity work, epistemic discoverability,
Legible Systems, and Reading Trails. It is **not yet publication-approved**.

The last approved public seed remains the 2026-09-18 edition recorded in
[`approval.json`](approval.json). That approval intentionally does not match
this candidate, so `build.py --release` remains blocked until Rae Lovejoy
reviews and explicitly approves the new source.

The page is one self-contained file with its styles, scripts, favicon, and
Cascadia Mono wordmark font embedded. It makes no runtime requests for fonts,
Expand Down
38 changes: 38 additions & 0 deletions site/VALIDATION.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,5 +1,43 @@
# Local validation — 2026-09-16

## Router-role copy candidate — September 25, 2026

**Status: review candidate only; not approved or released.**

Connector-level structural checks on the branch found:

- one `h1`;
- 60 unique HTML IDs with no duplicates;
- 27 internal fragment links with no missing targets;
- English translation JSON parses and covers all 171 referenced i18n/aria keys;
- two executable inline scripts remain present and the CSP still declares two
SHA-256 script hashes; the copy edit changed only HTML text, links, and the
non-executable translation JSON;
- all new canonical GitHub destinations exist on current `main`:
- `research/method.md`;
- `research/method-router.md`;
- `research/papers/coherent-systems/paper.md`;
- `concepts/dynamic-coherence.md`;
- `concepts/epistemic-discoverability.md`;
- `concepts/legible-systems.md`;
- `research/reading-trails/README.md`;
- the old selected-research labels (Intelligence Ecology, Events/patterns/scale,
Resilience/graceful-degradation, historical-contingency entry) are no longer
present in the selected-reading copy;
- required router-role copy is present in both visible HTML and the English
translation table.

`test_site.py` was updated so this branch is treated as an **unapproved review
candidate** rather than falsely expected to match the September 18 approved
preview. The release approval record remains unchanged, so the actual
`build.py --release` gate is intentionally expected to reject this candidate
until Rae Lovejoy approves the exact current source.

The complete Python site test suite and browser-layout/render checks were **not
executed in this connector-only pass**. They remain required before publication.
No live-domain or deployment check is claimed.


## Approved Root Sequence name explanation — 2026-09-18

- The About section includes a compact explanation of “root,” “sequence,” and
Expand Down
Loading