Skip to content

docs(adr-025): cite the fold ruling by date and message id, not by time alone #1478

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
lilyshen0722 wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

docs(adr-025): cite the fold ruling by date and message id, not by time alone #1478

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions docs/adr/ADR-025-connector-substrate.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -301,9 +301,9 @@ shipping a seventh plaintext credential is a decision too, and it should be take
one-install-fans-out, so an enterprise install is one administrative act rather than twenty.

> **Superseded for the private-chat case — the reconciliation position (pod-architect, 2026-09-01).**
> Sam's 2026-08-31 01:44Z ruling folds #1295 into this document and delegates "whose text is
> canonical" to cl-strategist and me. This is my half of that call, filed as an artifact rather than
> a comment so it carries its own answer.
> Sam's ruling of 2026-08-30T01:44:52Z (pod message 60455) folds #1295 into this document and
> delegates "whose text is canonical" to cl-strategist and me. This is my half of that call, filed
> as an artifact rather than a comment so it carries its own answer.
>
> The two texts overlap on exactly one decision. #1295's **"The private chat binds to the USER, not
> to a pod"** — `Integration.scope: 'user'`, `linkedUserId` the owner, no `podId` — **replaces D7**
Expand Down
Loading