Skip to content

fix(tools): expose remember to local-model agents #111

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
alpibrupa merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2026
Merged

fix(tools): expose remember to local-model agents #111

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
18 changes: 16 additions & 2 deletions src/tools/index.lex
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -139,8 +139,17 @@ fn all_tools() -> List[t.Tool] {
# lex_check/lex_spec_check/lex_test are (see lex-llm#51's
# is_verification_tool), so the run never got credit for actually finishing
# and burned its full step budget regardless.
#
# remember belongs here for the same reason: build_permission() allows it
# unconditionally, but it was missing from dynamic_tools() (#110), so a
# local-model build agent had no way to propose a memory candidate at
# all — confirmed live, the model correctly reported it had no such tool
# and declined to fabricate a call. A single [net, io, proc] tool that
# appends one JSONL line (see remember.lex/candidates.lex) is cheap
# enough for the curated core; it doesn't need load_toolset gating the
# way the heavier vcs/spec/store groups do.
fn minimal_tools() -> List[t.Tool] {
[read_tool.tool(), write_tool.tool(), edit_tool.tool(), grep_tool.tool(), glob_tool.tool(), bash_tool.tool(), todo_tool.tool(), check_tool.tool(), run_tool.tool(), test_tool.tool()]
[read_tool.tool(), write_tool.tool(), edit_tool.tool(), grep_tool.tool(), glob_tool.tool(), bash_tool.tool(), todo_tool.tool(), remember_tool.tool(), check_tool.tool(), run_tool.tool(), test_tool.tool()]
}

# Model name advertised to the LiteLLM proxy (must match a model_name in
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -250,8 +259,13 @@ fn plan_dynamic_tools() -> List[t.Tool] {
# lex_store_merge (they're already in dynamic_tools()'s gated store
# group) — a real bug in an earlier version of this function, caught by
# inspecting the actual tool list rather than trusting a live run.
#
# remember_tool belongs here too: refactor_permission() already lists
# "remember" in its allowlist, but this hand-built list omitted the
# actual tool (#110) — a local refactor agent was permitted to propose a
# memory candidate and had no way to.
fn refactor_dynamic_tools() -> List[t.Tool] {
list.concat([read_tool.tool(), write_tool.tool(), edit_tool.tool(), grep_tool.tool(), glob_tool.tool(), bash_tool.tool(), check_tool.tool(), audit_tool.tool(), sigid_tool.tool(), effects_tool.tool(), store_merge_tool.tool(), propagate_tool.tool(), guidelines_tool.tool()], list.concat(vcs_read_tools(), vcs_write_tools()))
list.concat([read_tool.tool(), write_tool.tool(), edit_tool.tool(), grep_tool.tool(), glob_tool.tool(), bash_tool.tool(), remember_tool.tool(), check_tool.tool(), audit_tool.tool(), sigid_tool.tool(), effects_tool.tool(), store_merge_tool.tool(), propagate_tool.tool(), guidelines_tool.tool()], list.concat(vcs_read_tools(), vcs_write_tools()))
}

fn tools_for_spec(spec :: sp.Spec) -> List[t.Tool] {
Expand Down
Loading