Repository navigation
plan: shadow-input-assembler - #288
Conversation
High-risk plan for the merged spec (G2, PR #273). Records spec-blob ab212e8 in frontmatter, names the seven files the implementation changes with line estimates and the accepted-exception size range, orders the work tests-first with each step mapped to the spec's requirements, and states the proof commands and expected outputs. Tracks #262 Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…gatives; zero shellcheck directives)
…on; line-drift note)
…-free bootstrap copy; pass-helper output)
… padding; source dir is E_TARGET)
Deploying ystack with
|
| Latest commit: |
329b2d5
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://b7545064.fabrica-6yx.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://ystack-plan-shadow-input-ass.fabrica-6yx.pages.dev |
|
PR #288 — independent high-risk plan amendment review Reviewer: Codex Reviewed-head: 302c4ba Artifact: Bugs: No Important findings. The measured 1199-line baseline and estimated restoration work support the proposed 1350–1650 range. Complete testing remains mandatory; the amendment does not treat reduced-test success as evidence of completion. Both prior wording nits are corrected. Security: No Important findings. File allowance, implementation behavior, security boundaries, original work steps and proof requirements remain intact. Implementation stays paused until acceptance and reconciliation. No rewrite, replacement attempt, activation or authority expansion is permitted. Compliance: No Important findings. Only the plan changes against the reviewed base. Every non-merge branch commit outside that base changes only the plan path. Merge commits have two parents and introduce no non-plan differences against their second parent. The latest parents are prior plan head followed by the exact reviewed base. Worktree is clean; published PR identity matches and uses The plan’s spec link matches base blob Content verdict: NO IMPORTANT FINDINGS. Required CI and operator plan acceptance remain pending. This review does not authorize implementation resume. |
|
Independent final review — PR #288 Reviewer: Codex Reviewed-head: 302c4ba Bugs: No Important findings. The measured baseline and estimated restoration work support the proposed 1350–1650-line range. All required tests remain mandatory; reduced-test results cannot establish completion. Security: No Important findings. The amendment preserves component scope, allowed paths, security boundaries, implementation steps and proof requirements. It leaves the original implementation paused and requires reconciliation before resuming. No activation, history rewrite or authority expansion is introduced. Compliance: No Important findings. The previously reviewed content and exact head/base are unchanged. Only the plan differs from base. Previously verified non-merge history is plan-only; merge topology remains valid. Artifact links are intact:
Latest supplied API evidence shows PR #288 open and clean, with no labels, including no CI run Verdict: PASS This passes independent plan review and CI verification, not operator acceptance. The plan still requires operator acceptance; implementation remains paused until that gate and the prescribed reconciliation are complete. Recheck head/base immediately before acceptance. |
|
Operator decision and base refresh The operator directly accepted PR #288's exact plan and delegated merge in current-session reply call_TL2Pvpizotz44mnffDKQzCLE/0: “接受这两份文件并授权代合并(推荐)”. This accepts plan blob d9d8b22261f2c342c92f8453c3f1239b0d45ba60, including the 1350–1650-line range with all tests required. The decision permits ordinary base refreshes with unchanged artifact contents and fresh CI/independent review. After #276 merged, this branch normally merged cfc8eab on top of prior head 302c4ba. New head is 329b2d5. Plan bytes are unchanged; only the plan differs from main. Fresh CI run 34764991952 and final independent evidence review must pass before the delegated merge. Implementation remains paused until merge and preserved-attempt reconciliation. |
|
Independent final review — PR #288 Reviewer: Codex Reviewed-head: 329b2d5 Bugs: No Important findings. The unchanged plan retains the measured 1199-line baseline, justified restoration estimate and complete testing requirements. The new base adds only the separately accepted resolver spec and does not change assembler interfaces or executable dependencies. Security: No Important findings. Component boundaries, allowed paths, source safeguards, environment handling and proof requirements remain intact. The amendment neither relaxes protections nor retroactively accepts incomplete implementation evidence. Compliance: No Important findings. Local and supplied live remote identities match the reviewed head/base. The worktree is clean. Previously verified plan-only history and ordinary two-parent merge topology are unchanged; only the plan differs from base. Artifact links remain valid:
Fresh CI run Live PR evidence shows open, mergeable and clean, with no labels or conflicts. Verdict: PASS The current operator’s exact-plan acceptance and delegated merge authorization were relayed by the manager. This review supplies independent evidence; it grants no additional authority. Recheck remote head/base immediately before the authorized merge. Implementation remains paused until the plan lands and the prescribed preserved-attempt reconciliation is complete. |
Tracks #262
The preserved assembler implementation exceeds the old 700–1000-line allowance and omits required tests. This plan-only amendment keeps the same component scope and seven allowed paths, requires complete test restoration, and proposes a 1350–1650-line range from the measured 1199-line baseline plus explicitly estimated restoration work.
The operator approved DR-3's direction and transferred sole management to the current Codex session: #262 (comment) . The implementation remains paused at 06b379b. This PR changes only work/shadow-input-assembler/plan.md; it neither restores tests nor changes the accepted spec. Its existing implementation steps, security boundaries and proof requirements remain intact.
Validation: exact source measurements and artifact hash links checked; independent content preflight found no Important issue. Required CI and a fresh exact-head/base independent review must pass before plan acceptance. After acceptance, resume the original implementation branch through normal reconciliation and merge the updated base without rewriting history.