Skip to content

feat(test-evm-tools): derive fork-block activation from the transition schedule - #3557

Open
spencer-tb wants to merge 1 commit into
ethereum:forks/bogotafrom
spencer-tb:t8n/transition-schedule
Open

spencer-tb wants to merge 1 commit into
ethereum:forks/bogotafrom
spencer-tb:t8n/transition-schedule

Conversation

@spencer-tb

@spencer-tb spencer-tb commented Sep 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Merge order: first. #3722 (EIP-8250) and #3535 (EIP-8253) build on it.

This is ported and edited from @jochem-brouwer's PR: #3535

Pass the tests fork transition schedule to the EELS t8n so it can identify the fork block and apply one time state changes. Previously, t8n received only the active fork for each block, losing the activation schedule.

The t8n tool now derives activation from that schedule, and ethereum-spec-evm t8n accepts transition names such as BPO2ToAmsterdamAtTime15k. External tools continue to receive the active fork name for each block.

Note, this will require the change on other client t8n tools as a follow up!

This provides the activation support needed by EIP-8253 (#3535).

Checklist

  • Ran fast static checks to avoid CI fails, see Code Standards & Verifying Changes: just static
  • PR title has the form <type>(<area>): <title>, where <type> and <area> come from an appropriate C-<type>, respectively A-<area>, label. The title should match the target squash commit message.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.44%. Comparing base (52161d9) to head (aed5b18).

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           forks/amsterdam    #3557   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage            94.44%   94.44%           
================================================
  Files                  624      624           
  Lines                36928    36928           
  Branches              3326     3326           
================================================
  Hits                 34875    34875           
  Misses                1450     1450           
  Partials               603      603           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 94.44% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jochem-brouwer jochem-brouwer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did not thoroughly review this PR, just one comment. What is missing in this PR such that it is still draft? I could not get this from the description 😄 👍

Comment thread docs/filling_tests/transition_tool_support.md
@spencer-tb
spencer-tb force-pushed the t8n/transition-schedule branch from 89fe081 to 62817f0 Compare September 15, 2026 11:48
@spencer-tb
spencer-tb marked this pull request as ready for review September 15, 2026 11:50
…n schedule

Co-authored-by: Jochem Brouwer <29359032+jochem-brouwer@users.noreply.github.com>

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants